Sure there are a few things that it needs, but really not many, and many of the so called missing featurea are actually there, they just are a little different from some other programs. But under that is the fact that many time, we, and again i place myself in that "we" sell RB short. Is that this is the PG forum, and sometimes we get a little protective of the brand. I also think that the reason that we, and I include myself in this "we" come back with "why not use RB" when the question was not about that. AS has been said several times each gets to pick what tools they want to use. Then again this is only an opinion, and certainly just one in a crowd of them. This time and energy, and not to mention money can be used to really learn the tools you have.
If the tools you have do not do the job, get new ones, if they do the job why spend money and time on something you do not need. The like those tools.īut for a guy that has not tapped out the abilities of RB, and already owns it, know how to use it, and it does what he wants, why buy something new and have to learn it, unless you just want to. Some like Mario are deeply invested in Sonar, or Cubase, or Reaper, or Mixcraft and that is the optimum work flow for them. Unless there is something that RB can't do, what reason is there to bypass it? He can open BiaB files directly into it, and mix from there.ģ. So why is RB involved? i believe in the since that:Ģ. Firstbassman brings up a great question, the OP asked about Mixcraft
0 kommentar(er)
